A couple weeks ago,
Britain lost out on its chance to house the first
Tesla factory in Europe. Elon Musk decided to choose a location near Berlin
instead, claiming that the uncertainty of Brexit made the investment too risky.
Berlin’s minister of economic affairs claims the factory could create around
six to seven thousand jobs in production with hundreds or thousands in other
areas. This is just one of the many affects upon Germany from receiving this
FDI; however, there is more to these effects than this. Which is why I would
like to take a look at some of these FDI effects so we can understand the
magnitude of what Germany is receiving from this investment, if it is truly a
net gain for Germany, and how they can optimize this investment.
In the short-run,
FDI increases capital causing the MPL to increase causing wages to rise.
However, returns to capital decrease because wages rise causing the MPK to fall
as less people can be employed for one piece of capital. The opposite is true
for the sending country (the US). FDI in the short-run will cause the US’s MPL
in the manufacturing sector to decrease as there will be less capital per
worker (as the capital that would’ve been employed went abroad) and this will cause
wages to fall. However, because wages fall, returns to capital rise. So, in the
short-run, FDI will cause the output of the manufacturing sector and wages to
increase in Germany, while returns to capital will decrease; conversely, in the
US wages and MPL will fall, and returns to capital will increase. To Germany,
this will be a net gain and would be beneficial for them to undertake this
investment.
The aforementioned
are the short-run effects of FDI which we know from class, but are there other affects
of FDI? In an empirical paper’s
findings which I looked at, it claimed that FDI, output growth, and financial
markets are interconnected; these findings show us that the positive affects of
FDI on economic growth will only be felt after a certain threshold of financial
market development. While there is much potential for Germany to receive from
this FDI, this research tells us that this investment may not be as beneficial
as once thought for Germany as the external factors needed for this kind of growth
may not be set up. Thus, in order for Germany to receive the full benefit of this
FDI, it should focus on the growth of its financial market before it becomes too
late to reap the full benefits.
You do a great job of laying out the pros and cons of the FDI in both Germany and the United States. Your post does a good job of showing how something that is unrelated, Brexit, could have an impact on FDI and the loss of potential jobs and higher wages.
ReplyDeleteOn another note, do you think that Germany is overall better off by accepting the FDI? As you state, output in the manufacturing sector and wages will both increase but the returns to capital decrease. Do these three things offset or do the pros outweigh the cons?
This was very interesting to read, especially the part you found out by yourself about the other effects of FDI that FDI, output growth, and financial markets are interconnected. In the future, what would be the effects FDI in the long-run in Berlin?
ReplyDeleteIt isn't shocking that Brexit ruined its chances of having a Tesla factory in the UK, but with Germany being so great at making automobiles, this was a good choice from Elon Musk.
ReplyDeleteThe effects of FDI are very interesting in this scenario for the short run and long run effects and for how beneficial they will be.
Do you think that Germany was the best place for Elon Musk to house this factory?