Nearly three
weeks after Hurricane Maria (and Hurricane Irma two weeks prior), Puerto Rico
is still struggling to manage the amount of devastation left behind by the two
storms. In their wake, nearly 3.5 million U.S.
citizens are still without power, fuel, food and even lack access to clean
water. Due to the immense power and destruction of Hurricane Maria alone, recovery
is going to take a very long time and encompass a litany of challenges for the
island. One challenge, specifically, is trade policy.
The Jones Act prohibits
any foreign built or foreign flagged vessel from engaging in coastwise trade
within the United States [Maritime Law Center]. Essentially, this law requires
that only American ships can carry goods from one US port to another and any
foreign vessels that enter an American port must pay punitive tariffs, taxes
and fees.
If a foreign
vessel carrying goods – such as food, water, medicine, or oil (which powers
Puerto Rico’s entire electrical grid)
comes directly into Puerto Rico it has to pay fees, duties, taxes and import
quotas. Its only alternative would be to reroute to Jacksonville, FL, where the
goods can be offloaded, reloaded onto an American vessel, then rerouted back to Puerto Rico. Regardless of the vessel's route, the costs this trade policy are
passed along to the Puerto Rican consumer and delay emergency relief effort
to the island.
Economist from
the University of Puerto Rico found that the Jones Act penalized the economy of
Puerto Rico to the effect of $17billion from 1990 to 2010. Research from the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York also finds that the act hurts Puerto Rico’s economy. In
fact, it appears that the only industry that continues to support this legislation
is the shipbuilding industry (it should be noted that this law also decrees that every ship must be built, crewed, and owned by American
citizens).
Now, President
Trump – despite much opposition and delay – did temporarily suspend the Jones
Act for Puerto Rico on September 28th. However, The Department of
Homeland Security announced on Thursday that it will not extend the 10-day
waiver on shipping limitations. But with Puerto Rico still in a state of
humanitarian crisis and the death count creeping upward, shouldn’t the waiver
be extended so trade policy will not continue to affect the relief effort? And
with the island having to completely rebuild its infrastructure and economy
over the next several years, should the Jones Act be dismantled completely?
For more information visit:
http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/28/news/economy/jones-act-puerto-rico/index.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/opinion/hurricane-puerto-rico-jones-act.html?mcubz=0
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-puertorico-shipping/extended-jones-act-waiver-not-needed-for-puerto-rico-dhs-idUSKBN1CA2C1
http://www.maritimelawcenter.com/html/the_jones_act.html
The Jones Act stands as a regulatory piece of legislature designed to benefit specific industries with no real concern for the impact these benefits will have to the consumers in Puerto Rico. This is an excellent example of Imperialism having lasting effects to this day. The recent hurricane exists to exacerbate the problems this act causes. The fact that the current administration has failed to take actions on these situations sooner is a travesty. This denies the basic rights that are afforded to the U.S. citizens within Puerto Rico. These effects on trade simply do not make sense. The market for Puerto Rico is too large to put these limitations on its growth. Legislation needs to be undertaken to remove the Jones Act.
ReplyDeleteFrom what it looks like U.S. is destroying Puerto Rico for political reasons, by doing so shooting themselves in the foot. Currently, by having all these restrictions on Puerto Rico who depend on shipping to get the majority of their food is causing problems in their welfare or at the very least isn’t increasing welfare. U.S. should at least consider allowing Puerto Rico to have its owns shipping industry. U.S can have tax on them but by having them their own shipping industry they wouldn’t get charged for having things sent to Florida.
ReplyDelete