The article is a good start towards understanding two big points in the course: 1. That trade is good overall; and 2. some groups are hurt by it. Here is a chart documenting world exports from 1900-1960 (using data from the IMF):
The drop from about 3,500 to about 1,500 occurs between 1929 and 1932, the beginning of the Great Depression in the US, and economic downturns throughout Europe. While correlation does not guarantee causation, most economic historians credit the drop in trade (which was largely caused by bad and protectionist policies) as one of the key factors in precipitating the global depression.
It also documents the political economy of trade policy: that the gains from trade are diffuse and unseen, whereas the gains from policy interventions are usually more concentrated and visible.
So, so basic reasons not to be protectionist: 1. to avoid retaliation; 2. to make consumers of imports better off (and consumers in general better off); and 3. to make exporters better off. The third reason is generally the hardest to grasp, and one which has fallen out of discussion over the last 20 years or so, but one that policy makers understood pretty well in the aftermath of WWII. We can only see this impact on exporters by developing general equilibrium into our understanding of trade theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment